Laboratuvar
IEEE 39-Bus Power Flow
A full Newton-Raphson AC power flow on the canonical IEEE 39-bus (New England) test system — bundled with the standard model data. Scale the load, switch any line out for an N-1 study, toggle generator Q limits, and see bus voltages, line loadings and system losses on the single-line diagram.
Basitçe
IEEE 39-bara sistemi, mühendislerin yöntem denemek için dünya çapında kullandığı, gerçek bir şebekenin (New England) küçük bir standart modelidir. Bu araç onun 'güç akışını' çözer: her jeneratörün ne kadar ürettiği ve her yükün ne kadar tükettiği verildiğinde, her baradaki gerilimi ve her hattaki gücü hesaplar — PowerFactory gibi ticari yazılımların kullandığı aynı iteratif yöntemle (Newton-Raphson). Talebi artırıp azaltabilir, herhangi bir hattı devre dışı bırakıp şebekenin geri kalanının bununla başa çıkıp çıkmadığını görebilir ('N-1' kontrolü), gerilimlerin ve hat yüklenmelerinin şema üzerinde nasıl tepki verdiğini izleyebilirsin.
Converged in 4 iterations
Newton-Raphson, mismatch 3.3e-11 p.u.
Slack gen
678 MW
Total loss
43.6 MW
Total load
6,254 MW
Worst line loading
76%
Voltage range
0.982–1.064 p.u.
How this is built: the network is the canonical IEEE 39-bus ("New England") test system, transcribed verbatim from MATPOWER's case39 (100 MVA base, 39 buses, 46 branches, 10 generators). It's solved with a standard polar-form Newton-Raphson AC power flow — the same routine MATPOWER, pandapower and PYPOWER run underneath — verified in this project's test suite to reproduce the published solved case (every bus voltage within 1e-3 p.u., losses ~43.6 MW). Generator Q-limit enforcement is optional and off by default, matching the canonical case. The load slider scales every generator's dispatch by the same factor, so the slack machine only covers the change in losses rather than the whole change in demand. This is the steady-state power flow phase — the same network and diagram also drive the classical-model transient stability study in the companion tool below.
Explore: IEEE 39-Bus Transient Stability
Apply a fault to this same network and watch every generator's rotor angle swing — including a critical clearing time finder.
Further reading
- T. Athay, R. Podmore and S. Virmani, “A practical method for the direct analysis of transient stability,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-98, no. 2, pp. 573–584, Mar. 1979. — the original source of the 39-bus data
- M. A. Pai, Energy Function Analysis for Power System Stability. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989. — the reference that popularised this test system
- R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sánchez and R. J. Thomas, “MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 12–19, Feb. 2011. — the case39 data file and reference solution this tool is checked against
- J. J. Grainger and W. D. Stevenson Jr., Power System Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994. — Newton–Raphson load flow, worked step by step